Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Public vs. Private


Writing It All Started in Gündelbach has posed a problem. Owing to privacy and “identity-theft” concerns, modern records are often more difficult to find and use than are centuries-old accounts, and they are certainly more sensitive. That we can choose our friends but not our relatives posed no problem when I wrote Henry the Immigrant about my father’s early progenitors, who have been dead for centuries. But one treads a perilous path when writing of protagonists with still living close relatives and descendants, as in the Imle book. One slip—an ill-chosen phrase, acceptance of a biased story, disclosure of a sensitive tale—and a plunge into acrimony or a family imbroglio can ensue.

In some other books I have written, I have omitted personal details (but not usually names) for still-living individuals, excepting a very few whose fame or notoriety had already put specifics before the public or who had allowed, perhaps requested, their particulars to be included. But I suspect most Imle descendants want to be included and would be hurt if they were relegated to a name only. On the other hand, I certainly cannot contact everyone for permission to include personal data. Right now, I am traversing a tightrope trying to answer the question “Who and what should I include?”

Comments?



No comments:

Post a Comment